The commit attempts to avoid a timing attack against PAM. Some attacker can know valid user names by timing how quickly PAM returns an error, so the fix is to use an existing user in the system we always validate against to ensure a consistent timing. But which user is always present on a Linux system? root!

The code does not check if root has any valid passwords set. An invalid user would fail, loop over to root and try validate. root has no password. It’s blank. We have nullok set. And we have pam_permit.so. The invalid user is authenticated. We have enough information to do a quick POC.

1 + 1 = 3.

source: L

NAT Slipstreaming allows an attacker to remotely access any TCP/UDP service bound to a victim machine, bypassing the victim’s NAT/firewall (arbitrary firewall pinhole control), just by the victim visiting a website.

This is neat, although you have to dig in a bit to learn it requires the NAT gateway to do some fancy SIP proxying.

source: L

Looking back on the early multimedia adventures of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, with a bit of nostalgia on the side.

Previously: https://tedium.co/2019/08/20/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-nunchucks-censorship/

What I want to focus on is (2), because it’s a lesson we learned the hard way in cryptography and didn’t transfer effectively to the rest of security engineering.

One of my favorite cryptographic attacks is the Bleichenbacher‘06 signature forgery. I wrote up how it works when I found it in python-rsa, so again go read that, but here’s a tl;dr. When you verify an RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature, you get a ASN.1 DER structure wrapping the message hash that you need to check. If you don’t parse it strictly, for example by allowing extra fields or trailing bytes, an attacker can fake the signature. This was exploited countless times.

The lesson we learned was that instead of parsing the ASN.1 DER to extract the message hash, we should reconstruct the ASN.1 DER we’d expect to see, and then simply compare it byte-by-byte.

The same technique would have saved Vault.

Python can execute code. Make sure it executes only the code you want it to.

Not exclusive to python either.

source: L

Interesting environment variables to supply to scripting language interpreters

source: HN

In my previous post, I talked about what the issue with Sectigo’s expired root was, from the perspective of the PKI graph, and talked a bit about what makes a good certificate verifier implementation. Unfortunately, despite browsers and commercial OSes mostly handling this issue, the sheer variety of open-source implementations means that there’s a number of not-so-good verifiers out there.

In this post, I’ll dig in a little deeper, looking at specific implementations, and talking about how their strategies either lead to this issue, or avoided this issue but will lead to other issues.

It’s pretty much all terrible, except the parts that are extremely terrible.

I used to be an anti-wire crusader. I hated the clutter of cables, and my tendency to unconsciously chew on them if they got anywhere near my face. But running into bug after tricky wireless bug—mostly while trying to make my video calls work better—I’ve apostasized. The more I’ve learned about wifi, Bluetooth and related protocols, the more I’m convinced that they’re often worse, on net, than wires.

This starts off with the usual, but then there’s some real wtf.

Qt included a component which would poll for networks every 30 seconds whenever a “network access manager” was instantiated, causing pretty much any Qt app using the network to degrade your wifi for ~5 out of every 30 seconds. There were already multiple bug reports for this issue, one of which was declared “closed” by an engineer because they allowed users to use an environment variable to disable the polling.

source: Dfly

Because Unicode contains such a large number of characters and incorporates the varied writing systems of the world, incorrect usage can expose programs or systems to possible security attacks. This is especially important as more and more products are internationalized. This document describes some of the security considerations that programmers, system analysts, standards developers, and users should take into account, and provides specific recommendations to reduce the risk of problems.

A large number of problems as well.

source: solar

Recently, I was tipped off about certain sites performing localhost port scans against visitors, presumably as part of a user fingerprinting and tracking or bot detection. This didn’t sit well with me, so I went about investigating the practice, and it seems many sites are port scanning visitors for dubious reasons.

source: HN

Yesterday Apple released iOS 13.5 beta 3 (seemingly renaming iOS 13.4.5 to 13.5 there), and that killed one of my bugs. It wasn’t just any bug though, it was the first 0day I had ever found. And it was probably also the best one. Not necessarily for how much it gives you, but certainly for how much I’ve used it for, and also for how ridiculously simple it is. So simple, in fact, that the PoC I tweeted out looks like an absolute joke. But it’s 100% real.

I dubbed it “psychic paper” because, just like the item by that name that Doctor Who likes to carry, it allows you get past security checks and make others believe you have a wide range of credentials that you shouldn’t have.

source: grugq

This investigation started, as so many of mine do, with me minding my own business, not looking for trouble. In this case all I was doing was opening my laptop lid and trying to log on. The first few times that this resulted in a twenty-second delay I ignored the problem, hoping that it would go away. The next few times I thought about investigating, but performance problems that occur before you have even logged on are trickier to solve, and I was feeling lazy. When I noticed that I was avoiding closing my laptop because I dreaded the all-too-frequent delays when opening it I realized it was time to get serious.

A lot of effort for a rather unsatisfactory conclusion, but I won’t spoil the surprise.

The story of how I gained unauthorized Camera access on iOS and macOS

We are beginning to form the attack plan - if we can somehow trick Safari into thinking our evil website is in the “secure context” of a trusted website, we can leverage Safari’s camera permission to access the webcam via the mediaDevices API.

Qualys contacted by e-mail to tell me they found a vulnerability in OpenSMTPD and would send me the encrypted draft for advisory. Receiving this kind of e-mail when working on a daemon that can’t revoke completely privileges is not a thing you want to read, particularly when you know how efficient they are at spotting a small bug and leveraging into a full-fledged clusterfuck.

Legacy code bad, even when it’s freshly written legacy code.

This post is a quick day one recap of what we know so far about CVE-2020-0601, what Microsoft has dubbed the Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability. I haven’t heard a catchy name yet, so I vote for Chain of Fools with a dutiful nod to the queen of soul, Aretha Franklin. The analyses presented (my own included) are only as good as the information we have on hand, which so far is still fairly thin on technical details. This is by no means intended to be exhaustive or authoritative, just a curated selection of information sources from people who are technically credible or experts in the field.

Also: https://blog.trailofbits.com/2020/01/16/exploiting-the-windows-cryptoapi-vulnerability/

https://whosecurve.com/

https://research.kudelskisecurity.com/2020/01/15/cve-2020-0601-the-chainoffools-attack-explained-with-poc/

https://medium.com/zengo/win10-crypto-vulnerability-cheating-in-elliptic-curve-billiards-2-69b45f2dcab6

source: green

The central irony (‘combination of circumstances, the result of which is the direct opposite of what might be expected’) referred to in this paper is that the more we automate, and the more sophisticated we make that automation, the more we become dependent on a highly skilled human operator.

GitHub’s forgot password feature could be compromised because the system lowercased the provided email address and compared it to the email address stored in the user database. If there was a match, GitHub would send the reset password link to the email address provided by the attacker- which was technically speaking, not the same email address.

This is beautiful.

source: HN

Let’s benchmark toupper implementations.

Actually, I don’t really care about toupper much at all, but I was writing a different post and needed a peg to hang my narrative hat on, and hey toupper seems like a nice harmless benchmark. Despite my effort to choose something which should be totally straightforward and not sidetrack me, this weird thing popped out.

source: L

Problems often appear just because we put some pieces together in the first place.

source: HN

What happens if we send an authenticated HEAD request to https://github.com/login/oauth/authorize? We’ve concluded that the router will treat it like a GET request, so it will get sent to the controller. But once it’s there, the controller will realize that it’s not a GET request, and so the request will be handled by the controller as if it was an authenticated POST request. As a result, GitHub will find the OAuth app specified in the request, and grant it access to the authenticated user’s data.

Help me, framework!

source: HN